IMF assessed the introduction of a 50% tax on bank profits.


The Deputy Head of the IMF Mission in Ukraine, Trevor Lessard, expressed his opinion on the introduction of a 50% tax on bank profits. He noted that this decision is not effective and contradicts the nature of the windfall tax. Such a tax burden can undermine trust in politics. Lessard emphasized that the windfall tax is usually introduced only for one year, as repeated tax increases may cause resistance among the population and undermine trust in politics. At the same Time, he noted that banks might change their profit policy in anticipation of the next tax increase. This is a rational step on their part, as there is a likelihood that such an increase will happen again. Lessard called for understanding Ukraine's needs in domestic revenues and considering the better choice of raising taxes in the long term, which will lead to dividends in the medium term, rather than a one-off increase that results in a revenue gap.
Read also
- The Ministry of Defense explained whether foreigners or stateless persons can obtain combatant status in the Armed Forces of Ukraine
- Trump demands 5% of GDP for defense: how NATO plans to meet this unprecedented requirement
- Russians are trying to establish fire control over logistics routes in Zaporizhzhia
- Strategic Partnership: Ukroboronprom and Rheinmetall Expand Arms Production in Ukraine
- Around 200 vessels and dozens of companies: EU tightens the sanctions loop around Russia
- The enemy cannot accumulate forces near the northern borders of Ukraine - OTU 'Siversk'